Re: [Dan.Oscarsson@kiconsulting.se: Comments on NFSv4 rfc3010bis- 05 draft]

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Nicolas Williams (Nicolas.Williams@sun.com)
Date: 01/26/03-02:11:47 PM Z 

Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 14:11:47 -0600
From: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
Subject: Re: [Dan.Oscarsson@kiconsulting.se: Comments on NFSv4 rfc3010bis- 05  draft]
Message-ID: <20030126141147.S16765@binky.central.sun.com>

No, ASCII text is a legal sub-set of UTF-8.

8859-1/2, non-ASCII text, is NOT legal UTF-8.

Cheers,

Nico

On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 06:38:10PM -0800, Noveck, Dave wrote:
> I'm not an expert but my understanding of normalization form KC
> is that under it "file" (that is, ascii f, ascii i, ascii l, ascii e)
> would be an invalid file name.  Can anyone who is familiar with this
> stuff confirm or deny?

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 03/04/05-01:50:49 AM Z CST