RE: Replication/Migration issues list

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Robert Thurlow (Robert.Thurlow@eng.sun.com)
Date: 10/10/02-01:53:20 PM Z


Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 12:53:20 -0600 (MDT)
From: Robert Thurlow <Robert.Thurlow@eng.sun.com>
Subject: RE: Replication/Migration issues list
Message-ID: <Roam.SIMC.2.0.6.1034276000.14788.thurlow@jurassic.eng>

Ted wrote:

> > > A filesystem version number helps the NFS client provide better
> > > semantics in several ways.

Dave wrote:

> First, I think this is an interesting facility even within the confines
> of fairly standard NFS implementations.  To see that, just turn Ted's 
> statement around ... [to] 
> "When the client checks the number and sees that it 
> hasn't changed, it knows that the filesystem has not been updated 
> and so it does not have to do any revalidation of individual cached 
> objects."

Thanks, that helped - and I agree this is interesting.  We'd
need to work out lots of semantics, but I will keep this on
the table as something to work on (I guess mostly as an NFSv4
core protocol feature for a future minor version).

Rob T


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 03/04/05-01:50:25 AM Z CST