RPCSEC_GSS = 6

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Peter Åstrand (astrand@lysator.liu.se)
Date: 08/03/02-06:17:30 AM Z 

Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 13:17:30 +0200 (CEST)
From: Peter Åstrand <astrand@lysator.liu.se>
Subject: RPCSEC_GSS = 6 
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208031310410.31731-100000@sofie.lambo.student.liu.se>

The non-existent definition of RPCSEC_GSS in the .x file causes some
problems in pynfs.  Currently, I'm hand-patching the .x file before
compilation and adds:

enum auth_flavor {
    RPCSEC_GSS = 6      /* RPCSEC_GSS security flavor */
};

What about adding this to the real .x file, would that cause any trouble
for others?  Or should the v4 .x depend on the RPCSEC_GSS .x (if something
like that exists) ?


-- 
/Peter Åstrand <astrand@lysator.liu.se>

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 03/04/05-01:50:07 AM Z CST