Re: Why does CB_* require a return path?

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Alfred Perlstein (bright@mu.org)
Date: 05/30/02-12:51:05 PM Z 

Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 10:51:05 -0700
From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>
Subject: Re: Why does CB_* require a return path?
Message-ID: <20020530175105.GV17045@elvis.mu.org>

* Brent Callaghan <brent@eng.sun.com> [020530 10:49] wrote:
> 
> This was discussed in August last year - the thread beginning here:
>  
>    http://playground.sun.com/pub/nfsv4/nfsv4-wg-archive/2001/0488.html
>  
> IMO it's embarrasing that NFSv4's most useful feature for
> Internet users (delegation) is useless for anyone that works
> behind a NAT (most of us).

Agreed!

But anyhow, my apologies for bringing up an old topic, thanks for
the pointer and I'm glad you guys are considering this issue.

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
 start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 03/04/05-01:49:46 AM Z CST