From: Spencer Shepler (shepler@eng.sun.com)
Date: 09/21/01-04:45:26 PM Z
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 16:45:26 -0500 From: Spencer Shepler <shepler@eng.sun.com> Subject: Re: remove of open file Message-ID: <20010921164526.W398@dhcp-aus08-191.central.sun.com> On Fri, David Robinson wrote: > > I like the approach, David. If we go with something like this, it > > seems like we need to allow for the removal of the file by other means > > at the server. For example, by local access to the fliesystem in > > question. I don't think we should place the burden on the server to > > implement server-wide protection against removal. > > If I understand you correctly, you are arguing > a file opened via NFS but removed through a different mechanism > (local access or different protocol) has undefined > semantics? If so I agree completely. I would encourage > NFS server vendors to implement a best possible solution > that causes the least surprise, but it would not be wise to > mandate a solution. Correct. This is what I was saying. -- - Spencer -
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 03/04/05-01:49:10 AM Z CST