From: Peter Åstrand (peter@cendio.se)
Date: 09/21/01-02:46:00 AM Z
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 09:46:00 +0200 (CEST) From: Peter Åstrand <peter@cendio.se> Subject: Re: Issues list for RFC3010 Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109210942070.2036-100000@sofie.lambo.student.liu.se> > > > I vote to remove "tag" at all. If it used for debugging - use snoop, if it > > > used for caching - use something else (xids from RPC) ... > I like the idea of a fixed length for the tag. > > It seems that its variable length is more of a > problem than its presence. Why is the variable length a problem? My opinion is that the tags should be included in the protocol, in one form or another. They are really useful, IMHO. -- Peter Åstrand Telephone: +46-13-29 08 61 Cendio Systems E-mail: peter@cendio.se Teknikringen 3 583 30 Linköping
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 03/04/05-01:49:08 AM Z CST