RE: COMPOUND result

From: Noveck, Dave (Dave.Noveck@netapp.com)
Date: 09/12/01-11:56:43 AM Z

• Next message: Peter Åstrand: "Re: UDP retransmission policies"
• Previous message: Peter Åstrand: "UDP retransmission policies"
• Maybe in reply to: Peter Åstrand: "COMPOUND result"

Message-ID: <8C610D86AF6CD4119C9800B0D0499E333355F5@red.nane.netapp.com>
From: "Noveck, Dave" <Dave.Noveck@netapp.com>
Subject: RE: COMPOUND result
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 09:56:43 -0700

Peter Åstrand wrote: 
>On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Spencer Shepler wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Peter ?strand wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm not sure I fully understand what is the result of the COMPOUND
> > > procedure. draft-ietf-nfsv4-00-00.txt (is this the newest one?) says:
> > >
> > > (13.1)
> > > ...
> > >  and the reply looks like this:
> > >
> > >      +------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+--
> > >      |last status | status + op + results | status + op + results |
> > >      +------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+--
> >
> > This is a symbolic representation.
> 
> I see. But I still think this would be a more correct representation:
> 
> +------------+-----+-----------------------+-----------------------+--
> |last status | tag | op + status + results | op + status + results |
> +------------+-----+-----------------------+-----------------------+--

In this context, I guess "+" is associative but not commutative.

• Next message: Peter Åstrand: "Re: UDP retransmission policies"
• Previous message: Peter Åstrand: "UDP retransmission policies"
• Maybe in reply to: Peter Åstrand: "COMPOUND result"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 03/04/05-01:49:05 AM Z CST