Re: RENAME clarifications

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Spencer Shepler (shepler@eng.sun.com)
Date: 02/04/00-01:18:33 PM Z 

Message-ID: <389B2609.B20A6DC6@eng.sun.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2000 13:18:33 -0600
From: Spencer Shepler <shepler@eng.sun.com>
Subject: Re: RENAME clarifications

"Noveck, Dave" wrote:

> > > >"On success, the current filehandle will continue to be the
> > > >target directory."
> > >
> > > I suggest that link follows the same logic as rename. It is
> > currently
> > > defined to change the current file handle from the target
> > directory to
> > > the link file upon success.
> >
> > This seems reasonable to have rename/link exhibit similar behavior.
> 
> This seems reasonable to me too.
> 
> I just want to make sure that everybody agrees what we are coding to
> for Connectathon.  Should LINK reflect draft-04 or this chnage?

I think we should stay with the draft-04 statement to help eliminate
any further confusion and work for Connectathon.

Spencer

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 03/04/05-01:48:03 AM Z CST