Re: Some issues with stateid's

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Neil Brown (neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au)
Date: 11/01/99-05:45:55 PM Z


From: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 10:45:55 +1100 (EST)
Message-ID: <14366.9779.190681.352059@notabene.cse.unsw.EDU.AU>
Subject: Re: Some issues with stateid's

On Wednesday October 27, dave.noveck@netapp.com wrote:
> 
> All of the stateid fields are OK but one of the locks
                                       ^^^
> designated by the stateid has been revoked.  ("Yes,
> that is our agreement, but I have decided it no longer
> applies.  So sue me").

I think the above "one" should be "all".
Unless there is a reliable way for the client to determine which lock
(or DENYal, or delegation) was revoked, there seems little point in
revoking one lock without revoking them all, and I can't see a client
doing anything useful with the remaining locks when one is gone.

NeilBrown


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 03/04/05-01:47:46 AM Z CST