RE: Caching (not cache consistency) proposal (LONG)

New Message	Reply	About this list	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Attachment view

From: Mike Eisler (mre@eng.sun.com)
Date: 07/24/99-10:02:41 AM Z

Next message: Noveck, Dave: "RE: Caching (*not* cache consistency) proposal (LONG)"
Previous message: Mike Eisler: "RE: Caching (*not* cache consistency) proposal (LONG)"
In reply to: Noveck, Dave: "RE: Caching (*not* cache consistency) proposal (LONG)"
Next in thread: Carl Beame: "ACLs"
Reply: Carl Beame: "ACLs"

Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 08:02:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mike Eisler <mre@eng.sun.com>
Subject: RE: Caching (*not* cache consistency) proposal (LONG)
Message-ID: <Roam.SIMC.2.0.6.932828561.16227.mre@eng.sun.com>

"'Ted Anderson'" <ota+@transarc.com> writes:
> Here!  Here!  I tend to think that delegation, and hence cache
> consistency, is more important for the name space than for the data.

Consider the source, an implementor of a very stateful file sharing system,
I find the above to be an intriguing statement. Are we attempting to
solve the wrong problem?

	-mre

Next message: Noveck, Dave: "RE: Caching (*not* cache consistency) proposal (LONG)"
Previous message: Mike Eisler: "RE: Caching (*not* cache consistency) proposal (LONG)"
In reply to: Noveck, Dave: "RE: Caching (*not* cache consistency) proposal (LONG)"
Next in thread: Carl Beame: "ACLs"
Reply: Carl Beame: "ACLs"

New Message	Reply	About this list	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 03/04/05-01:47:23 AM Z CST