Re: Update to Design Considerations document

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Devesh Shah (Devesh.Shah@eng.sun.com)
Date: 04/30/99-02:46:21 PM Z 

Message-Id: <199904301946.MAA13789@jurassic.eng.sun.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 12:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: Devesh Shah <Devesh.Shah@eng.sun.com>
Subject: Re: Update to Design Considerations document


> To: Spencer Shepler <shepler@eng.sun.com>
> Cc: nfsv4-wg@sunroof.eng.sun.com
> Subject: Re: Update to Design Considerations document
> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 12:17:15 PDT
> From: Vern Paxson <vern@ee.lbl.gov>
> 
> > 2.3.  Relationship with Older Versions of NFS
> 
> This sounds like there won't be any backwards compatibility in the protocol
> itself - a v3 client simply won't be able to work with a v4 server, and
> vice versa.  Is that right?  If not, then what parts of the API will stay
> compatible?
> 
> 
	Vern

I would think existing v3 clients will work with v4 server using the
NFS v3 protocol. Would not it ?

-devesh

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 03/04/05-01:46:58 AM Z CST