Re: locking errors

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Carl Beame (beame@mail1.tinet.ie)
Date: 10/06/98-03:15:24 PM Z 

From: Carl Beame <beame@mail1.tinet.ie>
Subject: Re: locking errors
Message-Id: <1998Oct06.211640+0100@panasonic>
Date: 06 Oct 1998 21:15:24 +0100

On Tue Oct 06 19:55:25 1998, Mike Eisler wrote:
> 
> The debate continues.
> 
> It comes down to:
> 
> 	- do want to use NFS V4 locking through firewalls?
> 	- do you want to require the server to maintain state
> 		through server reboot?
> 	- do you want your server to offer service quickly after
> 		a reboot?
> 

I am not going to argue in this message, but I have one question
which may clarify your position at least in my mind.

What do YOU propose as the default or best lease interval?

- Carl

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 03/04/05-01:46:30 AM Z CST