RE: Atomic operations - Comments Please

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: lance@eco.twg.com
Date: 07/17/98-08:59:37 AM Z 

From: lance@eco.twg.com
Subject: RE: Atomic operations - Comments Please
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 09:59:37 -0400
Message-ID: <E1CBD72DEEFDD011914400608CBA63D1162193@exch-mcl1.eco.twg.com>

> From: Brent Callaghan [mailto:brent.callaghan@eng.sun.com]
> If a recommendation of atomicity, rather than a requirement
> of atomicity,
> isn't strong enough for some clients, then they can resort to
> the mandatory
> locking of LOCKW, LOCKR, etc.

But if there is no atomicity, and LOCKW, LOCKR use leases, there is no
guarantee that this will work either.

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 03/04/05-01:45:59 AM Z CST