| To | "'mobile-ip@sunroof.eng.sun.com'" <mobile-ip@sunroof.eng.sun.com> |
| From | "Hesham Soliman (EPA)" <Hesham.Soliman@ericsson.com.au> |
| Date | Thu, 11 Oct 2001 11:54:50 +1000 |
| List-Archive | <http://playground.sun.com/mobile-ip/> |
| List-Owner | <mailto:owner-mobile-ip@sunroof.eng.sun.com> |
| List-Subscribe | <mailto:mobile-ip-request@sunroof.eng.sun.com?body=subscribe> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <mailto:mobile-ip-request@sunroof.eng.sun.com?body=unsubscribe> |
| Reply-To | mobile-ip@sunroof.eng.sun.com |
| Sender | owner-mobile-ip@sunroof.eng.sun.com |
>
> read the sentence again. when i said lets not change it,
> i meant lets not change BU as a destination option.
>
> => It is stil a BU OPTION just a different header
> you can still call it a DESTINATION option, like DST-3
> for example.
> Got it ?
Huh? i meant protocol 60.
=> Protocol 60 ? Have a look at Jari's
draft. I think this will be a good base for the
discussion.
Hesham