BUG: Problems with SET COLLATE and Queries with Integer Fields (176884)


The information in this article applies to:

  • Microsoft Visual FoxPro for Windows 3.0
  • Microsoft Visual FoxPro for Windows 3.0b
  • Microsoft Visual FoxPro for Windows 5.0
  • Microsoft Visual FoxPro for Windows 5.0a
  • Microsoft Visual FoxPro for Windows 6.0
  • Microsoft Visual FoxPro for Macintosh 3.0b
This article was previously published under Q176884

SYMPTOMS

Queries in Visual FoxPro that compare integer fields in the WHERE clause of a SQL Select statement between two or more tables may not return all matching records. This problem occurs when the collation sequence is set to anything but Machine.

RESOLUTION

The workaround to this problem depends on which version of Visual FoxPro is being used. Four workarounds are listed below:
  • Use the SET COLLATE command prior to running the query to set the collation sequence to Machine. This works in all versions of Visual FoxPro.
  • Create an index on the integer fields before running the query. The program in the Steps to Reproduce Behavior section can be modified to accomplish this. All records will then be returned.

    Follow each of the two CREATE CURSOR commands in the sample program with a command to create an index on the integer field. A sample follows:
    CREATE CURSOR t1 (in1 i)
      INDEX ON in1 TAG in1
      CREATE CURSOR t2 (in2 i)
      INDEX ON in2 TAG in2
  • Use numeric, float, or double type fields without decimal places instead of integer fields although this may affect query performance. You will need to test query speed if query performance is a concern. This workaround works in all versions of Visual FoxPro.
  • If you are using Visual FoxPro 5.0 or later, use the LEFT or RIGHT JOIN syntax to join the tables rather than the WHERE clause.

    For example, using the code from the Steps to Reproduce Behavior section below, you can use the following queries to produce the correct results. Keep in mind that the cursors created in the program below are stripped down with only an integer field in each. The SELECT statements below may produce very different results on real data although they produce identical results on the test data:
    SELECT * FROM t1 LEFT JOIN t2 ON t1.in1=t2.in2 INTO CURSOR t3

      SELECT * FROM t1 RIGHT JOIN t2 ON t1.in1=t2.in2 INTO CURSOR t3
    Either statement above can replace the following line in the sample program below: 
    SELECT * FROM t1,t2 WHERE in1=in2 INTO CURSOR t3
  • Unfortunately, the INNER JOIN syntax has the same problem as the SQL Select statement with the WHERE clause.

STATUS

Microsoft has confirmed this to be a bug in the Microsoft products listed at the beginning of this article.

MORE INFORMATION

The SET COLLATE command, according to the Visual FoxPro Online Help file, "Specifies a collation sequence for character fields in subsequent indexing and sorting operations." The command should not have any affect on numeric or integer type fields or their comparison.

Steps to Reproduce Behavior

  1. Run the following code in a program file in Visual FoxPro:
    CLEAR ALL
      CLEAR

      ** Store the current collation sequence to the variable yyy.

      yyy=SET("collate")

      ** Setting collate to General, a collation sequence that illustrates
      ** the problem.

      SET COLLATE TO "General"

      ** Create two cursors with one integer field in each

      CREATE CURSOR t1 (in1 i)
      CREATE CURSOR t2 (in2 i)

      ** Populate each cursor with 1000 records, inserting the loop counter
      ** into the integer field.

      FOR x=1 TO 1000
      INSERT INTO t1 (in1) VALUES(x)
      INSERT INTO t2 (in2) VALUES(x)
      ENDFOR

      ** The SELECT statement to join the two tables.

      SELECT * FROM t1,t2 WHERE in1=in2 INTO CURSOR t3

      ** Checking  _Tally to see how many records the query returned.

      WAIT WINDOW STR(_Tally)+" records returned by the query"

      ** Start of loop to determine what records are missing.

      x=0
      SCAN
      x=x+1
      IF NOT in1=x
      WAIT WINDOW "Missing integer"+ STR(x)
      x=in1
      ENDIF
      ENDSCAN

      ** Set collate back to its original setting

      SET COLLATE TO yyy
  2. The following table shows which records, out of the 1,000 in the test tables created above, are missing with the different collation settings and the platform (Windows vs. Macintosh): 
          Collation Sequence     Platform           Missing Records
      ------------------     --------           ---------------
      Dutch,  General
      German, Iceland
      Nordan, Spanish
      Swefin                 Windows           17, 273, 529, 785

      Uniqwt                 Windows, Mac      46, 302, 558, 814

      Dutch,  General
      German
      Nordan, Spanish
      Swefin                 Mac               24, 280, 536, 792

      Czech,   General
      Hungary, Polish        Eastern European
                             Windows, MS-DOS   22, 278, 534, 790, 1046

      Slovak                 Eastern European
                             MS-DOS            21, 277, 533, 789, 1045

      Slovak                 Eastern European
                             Windows           23, 279, 535, 791, 1047

      Czech,   General
      Slovak                 Kamenicky (Czech)
                             MS-DOS	       19, 275, 531, 787, 1043

      General, Iceland       Icelandic MS-DOS  19, 275, 531, 787, 1043

      Greek                  Greek MS-DOS      19, 275, 531, 787, 1043

      Greek                  Greek Windows     23, 279, 535, 791, 1047

      Russian                Russian MS-DOS    19, 275, 531, 787, 1043

      Russian                Russian Windows   22, 278, 534, 787, 1043

      Polish                 Mazovia (Polish)
                             MS-DOS            17, 273, 529, 785, 1041
    NOTE: The Iceland collation sequence is not available in Visual FoxPro for the Macintosh.
  3. Change the command SET COLLATE TO "General" to SET COLLATE TO "Machine" in the program above and note that no records are missing. One thousand records are returned from the query.
There is a pattern to the missing records. For the problematic collation sequences on the Windows platform, if the missing numbers are converted to hexadecimal, they all end in 11. This pattern continues into at least the next 1,000 records (2,000 total). On the Macintosh platform, the missing numbers, when converted to hexadecimal all end in 18. However, as an exception to the pattern, hexadecimal 518 or decimal 1304, does not turn up missing when the number of records in the test tables is 2,000.

The Unique collation sequence's pattern is also different. Here the missing numbers all end in E when converted to hexadecimal. If the number of records used is increased to 2,000, hexadecimal numbers 42E (decimal 1070) and 52E (decimal 1326) are not missing.

The problem described in this article is similar to another problem that was fixed in Visual FoxPro 5.0a that was related to character fields not integer fields.

REFERENCES

For additional information, please see the following article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base:

164869 SET COLLATE TO "GENERAL" May Affect Search Results

Modification Type:MinorLast Reviewed:3/14/2005
Keywords:kbbug kbpending KB176884
©2004 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.