FIX: Intrinsic Version of strcmp May Return Incorrect Result (167326)



The information in this article applies to:

  • Microsoft Visual C++, 32-bit Enterprise Edition 5.0
  • Microsoft Visual C++, 32-bit Enterprise Edition 6.0
  • Microsoft Visual C++, 32-bit Professional Edition 5.0
  • Microsoft Visual C++, 32-bit Professional Edition 6.0
  • Microsoft Visual C++, 32-bit Learning Edition 6.0

This article was previously published under Q167326

SYMPTOMS

Explicitly referencing the Null character in the second argument of strcmp causes the intrinsic version of strcmp to incorrectly report the two arguments are not equal. Please see the sample code below.

RESOLUTION

Use one of the following two workarounds:

  • Do not explicitly reference the Null character.
  • Do not use the intrinsic version of strcmp.
Please see the "MORE INFORMATION" section and sample code below.

STATUS

Microsoft has confirmed that this is a bug in the Microsoft products that are listed at the beginning of this article.

This problem was corrected in Microsoft Visual C++ .NET.

MORE INFORMATION

You can enable intrinsic functions either by using of the /Oi compiler switch or #pragma intrinsic. To disable intrinsic functions, remove the /Oi compiler switch, add /Oi-, or use #pragma function to force a function call on a function by function basis. Please see the sample code below for use of the #pragma function.

Sample Code

   /* Build Options: /Oi */ 
   #include <stdio.h>
   #include <string.h>
   // uncomment the following line for workaround #2
   //#pragma function(strcmp)

   int main(void)
   {
      char somestr [15]  = "Some String";

      somestr[1] = 0;

   // change the following to strcmp(somestr,"S") for workaround #1
      if (strcmp(somestr,"S\0") == 0)
         printf("match: correct\n");
      else
         printf("no match: incorrect\n");
      return 0;
   }
				
Note that a more common use of an embedded Null character may be to compare a string to "\0" to see if it is an empty string. For the first workaround above, compare it to "" instead.

Modification Type:MajorLast Reviewed:12/10/2003
Keywords:kbBug kbcode kbfix kbNoUpdate kbProgramming KB167326