PROBLEM: (OSF_QAR 67801) (Patch ID: OSF435-137) ******** A problem that caused whitespace differences while preprocessing certain Fortran files. PROBLEM: (GEM_BUGS 7255) (Patch ID: OSF435-137) ******** A run-time problem when compiling using -arch ev6 in which floating point compares were sometimes truncated to 32 bits. PROBLEM: (DECC 2717/CXXC_BUGS 6257) (Patch ID: OSF435-137) ******** A problem that caused an incorrect result when processing a statement of the form: return ids_stack[ids_stackptr--]; PROBLEM: (GEM_BUGS 7542/CXXC_BUGS 6255) (Patch ID: OSF435-137) ******** A problem that caused an unexpected result with a large right shift. PROBLEM: (C_PLUS_PLUS 4433/GEM_BUGS 7632) (Patch ID: OSF435-137) ******** An optimizer problem that caused incorrect results at -O2, which was discovered in the C++ compiler, but could also be a problem in C. PROBLEM: (DECC_BUGS 1431/GEM_BUGS 7775) (Patch ID: OSF435-137) ******** A problem that caused incorrect results in the Perl "op/pack" test when Perl was compiled with optimization. PROBLEM: (CXXC_BUGS 6415/DIGITAL_UNIX 5109) (Patch ID: OSF435-137) ******** A compilation error for a statement of the form: a = strcpy(b,c) + 7; when compiled with -O2. PROBLEM: (OSF_QAR 71227, GEM_BUGS 7979) (Patch ID: OSF435-264) ******** A compiler problem that allowed the generation of ev67 instructions (ctpop, ctlz, cttz) to be generated when using the -arch ev6 switch. PROBLEM: (CXXC_BUGS 6746) (Patch ID: OSF435-264) ******** A compile time performance problem with a very large (1.6 MB) initialization of an array. PROBLEM: (DECC 2745, GEM_BUGS 7619) (Patch ID: OSF435-264) ******** An optimizer problem that caused an incorrect result when using a signed char in a strcpy-like routine, if compiled -O4 or higher. PROBLEM: (DIGITAL_UNIX 5720, GEM_BUGS 8095) (Patch ID: OSF435-264) ******** An optimizer problem that caused an incorrect result for certain write-hint instructions generated when compiled -arch ev6 -O. PROBLEM: (OSF_QARs 73556, 75960) (Patch ID: OSF435-413) ******** o A compiler crash when compiling Xemacs 21.1.4 with -O4 o An optimizer problem in loop unrolling that suppressed intermediate updates to induction variables under certain conditions. o A particular short parameter assignment caused incorrect run-time result o An assignment of type k = (char)(l >> 8) was not sign-extended o An optimizer problem that produced incorrect code when certain bounds checking within a loop was moved outside the loop.